Thanks all for experiences and insights. I am serious about moving some cheese. We are thankful for a church questioning traditions (sorry Tevvy). Every Baptist church I have been a part of celebrated it the 1st Sunday. That’s East Coast, Midwest, and West Coast. I wanted to check the theology of it, the recent history among Baptists, and the logistics of actually doing it (who it will it fall on to set-up, serve, and clean up?).
2 months ago we celebrated communion on our knees. We often sing
Let Us Break Bread Together on Our Knees; why not do it? We had a small table with wheels near the stage. The young people all got on their knees. The older people sat in the first row of chairs and reverently leaned forward. It was the most beautiful service I had ever been a part of. I asked if someone felt led to give thanks for the loaf. An aged person did. A teenager prayed for the cup. I couldn’t have orchestrated that better. In my short tenure I have learned to talk to the “little-old-lady” Sunday school class ahead of time. They always appreciate being a part of decision making. 9 out of 10 times they are for whatever we do. They just don’t always want to be a part of it.
Currently I am thinking about doing communion every other week for 2 months, just to see how it goes and feels. I have several weeks before we may decide. I could even table that decision another month.
Some folks mentioned Baptists may do it less-weekly to be less Catholic and Anglican. They celebrated less to be more reverent for the ordinance and make it more special. They didn’t want to take it for granted. I can’t remember if Episcopalians celebrated communion each week.
I love this passage of the church’s founding:
Acts 2:37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. 39 The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.” (boldly preaching good news)
40 With many other words he warned them; and he pleaded with them, “Save yourselves from this corrupt generation.” 41 Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day. (conversion growth)
The Fellowship of the Believers
42 They devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and to the fellowship (Family), to the breaking of bread (communion/eating together) and to prayer (talking to God). 43 Everyone was filled with awe (live church!), and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles (power of God present). 44 All the believers were together and had everything in common (spirit of giving). 45 Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need (sacrifice). 46 Every day they continued to meet together in the temple courts (church not 1 hour a week). They broke bread in their homes and ate together with glad and sincere hearts, (familial spirit) 47 praising God and enjoying the favor of all the people (faith-filled reputation). And the Lord added to their number daily those who were being saved. (Praise God for deep conversion growth)
We are racking our brains for meaningful ways to celebrate communion without compromising the awe and wonder of the solemn act.
1 more thought: we are pretty settled to whether we have an open or closed communion. We are talking about the issue of kids taking communion. One church where I pastored was dead against children (pre-Baptism) taking part in the service. When I read about the Lord’s Supper, which has its roots in the Passover/Seder meal, I see kids not only a part of the meal but the meal is geared for them. When the children ask “why we do this?” the leader is to explain how “God took us out of Egypt”. The children may speak of adult descendants but in the modern Seder meal, kids are very active in it. I do know there were no children present when Jesus broke bread to talk about a “New Covenant”, but to imply he was excluding kids from partaking in the meal seems a tad stretchy. He championed the idea of the kingdom of God being for kids.
Any thoughts?
chip.